Terms & Conditions
We as a company must operate within the law at all times. If we undertake surveillance it is to establish evidence on behalf of clients in pursuance of the matter we have undertaken to investigate and the aims and objects agreed upon.
In 2010 laws were introduced to prevent stalking as a need was identified that some individuals used certain means to alarm victims by persistently following or watching them or otherwise pestering them with unwanted attention. To protect victims, offences were created criminalising this conduct which is either intended to cause fear and alarm or can be reasonably judged to be likely to cause such fear and alarm. The intention of the legislation is to protect the vulnerable from those who intend to alarm them or conduct unwanted obsessive behaviour towards them this is often ex-partners or persons who have unwholesome and unwanted pursuance of the persons they stalk.
We are not criminals who seek, by virtue of what we do, to alarm or terrorise the victim. We are professional investigators who seek to evidence the alleged wrongdoing of the persons under surveillance. This for a legitimate purpose. Although the legislation is clearly intended to prevent the acts of criminals who seek to cause mental or perhaps physical harm, the wording of it can be interpreted in a broad sense to include acts that may be conducted without criminal intent.
We must conduct surveillance in such a way we negate causing fear or alarm to the person under surveillance or any other person.
We do this by using sufficient resources so as to mitigate the risk of being noticed and by using techniques as used for example by the police who follow a national surveillance model standard. We ensure that our investigators train to the required standard. Put in simple terms investigators are not invisible they will be seen but they endeavour not to be noticed.
Bearing in mind the foregoing legislation we seek to ensure that we are not acting on behalf of someone who seeks to break such laws so we have a duty to establish that this is not the case and that the purpose of surveillance is not intended at any time to cause alarm to the subject of surveillance or others. We must also ensure that if we produce evidence in a report that the report is not used as a tool to cause alarm.
Further information on stalking can be found at the following links:
The legislation The Criminal Justice and Licensing (Scotland) Act Section 39
Advise by the Police
Advice and research by the Scottish Government
Regulation of Investigatory Powers (Scotland) Act 2000 and Licensing
Please note that surveillance conducted by PUBLIC BODIES is regulated by the Regulation of Investigatory Powers (Scotland) Act 2000 the public bodies that this regulates are defined by the act they include the Police, Government departments, Local Authorities and Health Boards. As we are not one of the defined public bodies we are not regulated by the act UNLESS we are working on behalf of such authority and duly authorised by them. We do however operate within the spirit of the legislation although as explained we are not regulated by it. No similar legislation is in place to regulate private investigation and the government have no licensing of private investigators in the UK.
RISK ASSESSMENT AND CLIENT UNDERTAKINGS
We must take all diligent steps to ensure that we are not being asked to illegally stalk people on behalf of those who seek to breach the stalking legislation. We thus must ask potential clients to answer the following questions and make the following undertakings.
We require that clients advise us of the following to enable us to fulfil our duty of care to operate within the current legislation. We require that you take the undertakings below in order that we can be assured that we are operating under legitimate circumstances.
Has the person to be placed under surveillance either by the client or others on the clients’ behalf?
Has the subject been caught before or been made aware of previous surveillance?
Has the subject been made aware of the suspicions of the wrong doing they are suspected of?
Would the subject of surveillance have any other reason to suspect surveillance by for example, a law enforcement or other agency?
Do any other circumstances prevail that may make the client surveillance aware?
YOU MUST UNDERTAKE TO NOTIFY US OF ANY CIRCUMSTANCES THAT MAY INFER THE SUBJECT IS LIKELY TO BE SURVEILLANCE AWARE.
YOU MUST UNDERTAKE TO ADVISE US THAT THE INTENTION OF THE SURVEILLANCE IS NOT INTENDED TO CAUSE ALARM.
YOU MUST UNDERTAKE THAT NO LEGAL ACTION IS PENDING AGAINST YOU INVOLVING ABUSE OF THE SUBJECT AND THAT NO BAIL OR OTHER RESTRICTIVE CONDITIONS ARE OR HAVE PREVIOUSLY BEEN IN PLACE.
WE CANNOT GIVE LEGAL ADVICE AND SUGGEST THAT YOU ACQUIRE SUCH ADVICE IF IN ANY DOUBT.